Paul Bender, professor and dean emeritus, recently participated in an Arizona Town Hall "Riding the Fiscal Roller Coaster: Government Revenue in Arizona," and was quoted in a report on the event titled, "Arizona Town Hall Calls for Bold Action to Solve the State's Fiscal Crisis," at http://knowledge.wpcarey.asu.edu/.
About 140 of Arizona's leaders gathered in November at the Grand Canyon for the 95th Arizona Town Hall in meetings designed to bring Arizonans together for three days of discussion, culminating in a plenary session where participants adopt a final report of findings and recommendations.
"The topic, governmental revenue, is urgent in a state where a crippling budget crisis casts a forbidding shadow over the next several years," states the Nov. 10, 2009, article.
"Despite a constitutional requirement that the legislature balance the budget, for example, the state carried over a deficit of $400 million into the current fiscal year," the article states.
"The balanced budget requirement has no teeth," Bender said. One participant proposed a constitutional convention, but there was some question as to whether a constitutional convention would open up a Pandora's box -- subjecting every area of Arizona law to debate and potential change.
Bender said that it would be feasible to limit a convention to certain subjects -- issues that relate specifically to revenue, for example.
Voters would have input at two points in the process, Bender said. "First, the public would vote on the questions, 'Should we have a constitutional convention? What will the rules be?' Second, the public would vote on the constitutional changes proposed by the convention."
Read the article here.
Bender teaches courses on U.S. and Arizona constitutional law. He has written extensively about constitutional law, intellectual property and Indian law, and is coauthor of the two-volume casebook/treatise, Political and Civil Rights in the United States. Bender has argued more than 20 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, and actively participates in constitutional litigation in federal and state courts.